Labels
Posted by Glenn Date:

There are no black holes. They do not exist.



Let's get straight to the point. The vast majority of us have been lead to believe that hypothetical objects constructed from unrealistic physics and impossible mathematics, is real. The blame can be laid squarely on the shoulders of our current cosmology establishment. Right off the bat the notion of a Black Hole being science fails. It fails because science must be falsifiable, black holes are not falsifiable so therefore not science. Now that's a claim that sounds sensational, but as Dr. Roubitaille points out below, this is an assessment that must be made for the broader reputation of science.



Does Relativity predict black holes?

Einstein himself published a paper containing many mathematical refutations of black holes existing due to such things as angular momentum.

Robert Oppenheimer, best known for the Manhattan Project and the nuclear bomb, published a paper disproving black holes using the same reasoning of Relativity which predicted black holes. Easy to see why Einstein saw them a quirk of the mathematics if projected too far.  In Oppenheimer's paper the gravitational field strength would become so strong that time would slow asymptotically and the singularity never reached. I would never normally use one unproven theory (no engineering is based on General Relativity, not even GPS) to disprove a hypothetical object, except when its the theory that predicted them, since that in itself is an intractable logical conflict.

Eric Lerner, Chief scientist for LPP Fusion, discusses below:



Black holes or plasmoids?

This next clip is actually conclusive proof that Sagittarius A is not a black hole, featuring clips of all the LAMBDA-CDM astronomers making bold predictions that an approaching gas cloud would be "sucked in". Well, guess what? Not only was the gas cloud not sucked in, it actually slowed down! Now answer me this: How does a black hole simply decide to "switch itself off". This is completely and utterly devastating to black hole theory! Also note the stars near the galactic center were not orbiting the equatorial plane but rather around toroidal plasmoid field lines, and note that very importantly there was no gravitational lensing, which also seems to decide to switch itself off when suitable. 


A Fascinating fatal problem for black holes

The black hole cannot exist in the big bang universe.  This is according to the established model, including Stephen Hawking's mathematics. 

Consider this: All alleged black hole universes are spatially infinite, are eternal, contain only one mass, are not expanding and either asymptotically flat or curved. However, all alleged big bang universes are either spatially finite in one case or spatially infinite two different cases, are of finite age (13.8 billion years), contain radiation and many masses, and are not asymptotically anything. Thus, by their very definition big bang universes and black hole universes are mutually exclusive. They cannot co-exist. 

These fundamentally intractable logical conflicts extend to the geometry of Black Holes:



The exclusionary fundamental mathematical predictions tell us that if we are to start taking ourselves seriously then we must at the very least face up to the reality that either the big bang is a scientific fact, or black holes are a scientific fact, or neither, but both cannot be by the definition of the mathemagicians that invented them. They simply cannot both be facts and this is according to comparing Hawking models, Kip Thorne, Roger Penrose etc types of theoretical black holes with inflationary mathematics and the big bang of LAMBDA-CDM.  This conflict is typically not so widely advertised for obvious reasons.


Below: Steve Crothers completely and utterly destroy the mathematics 
and physics of "Black Holes", LIGO and gravitational waves



Below: 2 minute overview of the production of plasmoids in a laboratory.


To frame the load bearing function of the proven plasma phenomenon known as a plasmoid, we first need to understand its place in the galactic circuit. There are several models for this, here is one of the earliest ones.


https://phys.org/news/2017-11-dark-narrowed.html?fbclid=IwAR3hQ2uYzc-VRjROqqIDXQJG17zOfDA9apL264p68CEsY9zKho9ZA 

 Hannes Alfven is a Nobel Prize winner


https://www.academia.edu/19525506/How_the_Electric_Plasma_Universe_Creates_Galaxies?fbclid=IwAR1xU2ix3t3lFUDyyIZrBSucOLIq9KFJ9Ym-7e2xIby3UoYP4w62HE-CQFo


When the suggested black hole at the heart of our Milky Way galaxy this year flared suddenly to 75X its usual brightness, many physicists concluded that we may need to revisit our model. Meanwhile,  This behavior  was already predicted by the proponents of an Electric Universe, who all along had been saying we were looking at a phenomenon of electrodynamics known as a PLASMOID. These flaring and brightening events are indicative of the load function ultimately leading up to discharge as the discussed polar jets.


If this is new information to you, it's best not to lose sight of the fact that plasmoids are known science. Black holes were never proven. They were decided, not proven cannot even be observed.  They remain essentially hypothetical, speculation despite the press releases treating them as if they are established fact. 

That statement I have just made is a true statement. Let that sink in for a moment and keep an open mind.


Moreover, plasmoids are expected phenomena in Plasma Cosmology and with the cosmic web made up of self contained plasma magnetic entities and the electrodynamically active ionized plasma that facilitates it carrying charge once charge is separated at galactic centers, they must be central in the galactic circuit. Plasma makes filaments, creates magnetic fields and discs. Gravity forms round orbital systems. So that means plasmoids are expected exactly where black holes are alleged to be in the standard cosmological model. Plasmoids functioning as a load in the galactic circuit account for all the observable signs we ascribe to black holes, plus they are expected to discharge massive interstellar jets, just like the dipole jets they discharge in the lab. No black holes are made in labs or even observed forming galaxies... Or even moving towards galactic center's. The one they thought they found turned out to be within the margin of observational error.


Now this notion of these jets being accretion discs is even more fantastical. There is no mechanism in physics that accounts for such a notion. Accretion disc shooting out as polar jets, in long, thin beams, (lightyears long in the case of supposed supermassive black holes) and nearly at light speed, seems a bit of a stretch. Why does the beam remain so focused and not disperse into the "vacuum" of space?

Lets face it, the actual observable evidence doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

Above: 14 years of no gravitational lensing around our supposed black hole, Sagittarius A.


Sagittarius A* Astrophysical Orbital Data for S2 & S14

Star LabelImpact Parameter ξGravitational Deflection α

(light time)

(meters)

AU

(radians)

          (degrees)

       (arcsec)

S14

6 Lhours*

6.47553E+12

43.29

3.64949E-03

0.209100573

752.762062

S2

17 Lhours*

1.83473E+13

122.65

1.28806E-03

0.073800202

265.680728

S2

5.5 Ldays

1.42462E+14

952.30

1.65886E-04

0.009504571

34.2164573

S2

10 Ldays

2.59021E+14

1731.46

9.12373E-05

0.005227514

18.8190515

* Nearest Point of Approach to supposed Black Hole

Table: Gravitational Deflection as function of Impact Parameter o

as Predicted by the Light Bending Rule of General Relativity 


Figures above: Animation of a Textbook Depiction of Gravitational Lensing at Sagittarius A*(Note: This is a textbook depiction that is not yet observed in all modern Astrophysics.)The astrophysical events taking place at Sagittarius A* might appear as such if the Light Bending rule of General Relativity actually applied(showing time resolved images from 1998.8 to 2003.2)


For a gravitation mass of 4 million times the sun (the galactic mass of Sagittarius A*) at the same impact parameter,
 a gravitational deflection for the light ray would be α = (1.75/214) x 4*10^6 = 32710 arcsec or α = 9.08 degrees. 
This would be a very noticeable lensing effect for modern astronomical means. 
It is also interesting to note that the orbiting stars denoted as S2 and S14 have highly elliptical orbits with orbital
periods of 15.24 and 38 years respectively. Also note that the nearest point of approach in the orbits of S2 and S14
 to the perceived black hole occurred at 2002.315 and 2000.156 respectively. This double event occurred to within
 2.159 years apart from one another; a back-to-back event. This will not occur again for another 76 years and 152 years,
 when the nearest point of approach is predicted to occur to within 3 years of one another, assuming correctness of the
 orbital periods of these stars. Either a missed opportunity occurred during the observation of this back-to-back
 gravitational lensing event or this gravitational lensing effect, as is predicted by the light bending rule of General
 Relativity, simply does not occur.

To date there has been no evidence of a gravitational lensing effect as can be detected from the broad band 
emissions of electromagnetic waves coming from the stellar objects orbiting about Sagittarius A*. The emissions
 that permit the astrophysicists to track these stellar objects, moving strictly according to Kepler's laws about 
Sagittarius A*, lie predominantly in the ultraviolet, x-ray and gamma-ray regions of the electromagnetic spectrum.
 All these emissions, however, are theoretically subjected to the very same light bending rule of General Relativity. 
An evidence of gravitational light bending at the site of Sagittarius A*, as is predicted by the light bending rule of 
General Relativity, is yet to be observed; an area under intense observations by modern Astrophysics since its 
discovery in 1992.


Nobody has seen a black hole, they are inferred by measuring the same bright radio spots in X-Ray you would expect from plasma magnetic entities.  As mentioned the chance of them mysteriously occurring where the central capacitance load (plasmoid that we would expect to discharge at a critical threshold) should be according to experimentally well verified dynamics. This seems to me to be a bit weak in terms of likelihood. X-rays are just Electromagnetic Waves  on   a different spectrum to visible light which is not meant to be able to escape the event horizon (just like the the galactic jets). We are told that this means the are generated by the accretion disc despite it being inconceivable such a sustained and consistent signal should be possible from such an inconsistent source. And by what mechanism?

Above: The synthetic images

As we can see, the recent "proof" of a black hole M87 offered up by the Event Horizon team in reality only showed us the characteristic doughnut shape of a plasmoid, and it did so from super-imposing  62 000 synthetic images together and speculating on "noise" signals. The image could be anything vaguely torus shaped. Doughnuts and plasmoids come to mind. 

Plasma magnetic entity: Plasmoid

And here below compiled brilliantly in the embedded multi-media clip, the topic of cosmic jets only act as EVIDENCE for Plasma Cosmology. Black holes should not eject matter, even by the given patchwork reasoning, nor should they remain so thin and focused without dispersion into the vacuum of space, among other other theory-shredding problems. These are evidence of plasmoidal behavior.


Detailed scrutiny of the image of the black hole supposedly at M87.  It seems they they pulled the signal from the noise and from their own expectations. An MRI and Imaging expert examines the claims.


Here are the papers from Event Horizons supposed black hole, why not scrutinise them yourself?




References:
References supported by the following scientific papers

Black holes: 

https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0569
Bekenstein-Hawking Black Hole Entropy, Hawking Temperature, and the Unruh Effect: Insight from the Laws of Thermodynamics – a Synopsis
Authors: Stephen J. Crothers, Pierre-Marie Robitaille

By Professor Donald Scott:

Black Hole X-Ray Sources

Irwin et al recently reported on ultraluminous X-ray bursts in two ultracompact companions to nearby elliptical galaxies NGC 4697 and NGC 5128 (sources 1 and 2 respectively). Although they discuss a number of possibilities, they favour neutron stars and black holes as the likely sources: "the sources appear to be normal accreting neutron-star or black-hole X-ray binaries". However, there is no possibility for black holes to be associated with these X-ray sources because the mathematical theory of black holes contains a latent violation of the rules of pure mathematics.

Mathematical Theory of Black Holes – Its Infinite Equivalence Class

There exists an infinite equivalence class of solutions for the equations Rμν = 0, thereby constituting all admissible 'transformations of coordinates'. If any element of this infinite equivalence class cannot be extended to produce a black hole then none can be extended to a black hole, owing to equivalence. No such element can be extended to produce a black hole. Consequently, the mathematical theory of black holes violates the rules of pure mathematics.

Comment on the Black Hole in Markarian 1018

It has recently been reported in the journal 'Astronomy and Astrophysics' that the active galactic nucleus of Markarian 1018 has likely changed optical type due to the effects of a supermassive black hole or a binary system consisting of two such black holes. It is however impossible for any type or form of black hole to be involved with Mrk 1018 because the mathematical theory of black holes violates the rules of pure mathematics.

PLASMA COSMOLOGY


ELECTRIC SPACE

The Evidence For Electrical Currents in Cosmic Plasma, A. L. Peratt, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 18, p.26 (1990) (548KB).

Plasma Experiments in the Laboratory and Space, A. L. Peratt, C.-G. Fälthammar, and N. Rynn (1992) (548KB)

Equilibrium of Intergalactic Currents, B. E. Meierovich and A. L. Peratt, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 20, p.891, 1992 (152KB)

Alfvén Waves and Birkeland Currents, T. A. Potemra, Physica Scripta, T60, 107-112, 1995




ENERGY DENSITY AND TEMPERATURE OF UNIVERSE

The Redshift Revisited A.K.T. Assis and M.C.D. Neves(36KB), Astrophys. Space Sci. 227, 13-24, 1995 (696K)


Thermalization of synchrotron radiation from field-aligned currents, W. Peter and A. Peratt, Laser and Particle Beams, vol. 6, part 3, pp. 493-501, 1988 (560K)


COBE Sows Cosmological Confusion, Science, vol. 257, 28, 1992 (356K).

Fretting About Statistics, Daniel Kleppner, Physics Today, July 1992 (236KB).


GALAXIES

Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies, H. Arp, Astrophys. J., Supplement Series, 123-132, 1966 (152K).

Evolution of the Plasma Universe: I. Double Radio Galaxies, Quasars, and Extragalactic Jets, A. L. Peratt, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. Vol. PS-14, N.6, pp.639-660, December 1986.(1.7M)

Evolution of the Plasma Universe: II. The Formation of Systems of Galaxies, A. L. Peratt, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. Vol. PS-14, N.6, pp.763-778, December 1986 (1.9M).
The Role of Particle Beams and Electrical Currents in the Plasma Universe, A. L. Peratt, Laser and Particle Beams, vol.6, part.3, pp.471-491, 1988.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, SPECIAL ISSUES ON PLASMA ASTROPHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY

Guest Editorial: Plasma Experiments in the Laboratory and in Space, A. L. Peratt, C.-G. Fälthammar, N. Rynn, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 1992 (548K).
Guest Editorial, Space Weather Effects, S. T. Lai, N. Singh, A. L. Peratt, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. December 2000 (36K).
Guest Editorial Sixth Special Issue on Space and Cosmic Plasma, A. L. Peratt and C.-G. Fälthammer, December 2003 (1.4MB)
Guest Editorial Seventh Special Issue on Space and Cosmic Plasma, A. L. Peratt and T. E. Eastman, August 2007 (3 MB)
LABORATORY ASTROPHYSICS
Evolution of Colliding Plasmas, A. Peratt, J. Green, and D. Nielsen, Physical Review Letters, 44, pp. 1767-1770, 1980 (248K).
Microwave Generation from Filamentation and Vortex Formation within Magnetically Confined Electron Beams, A. L. Peratt and C. M. Snell, Physical Review Letters, 54, pp. 1167-1170, 1985 (688K).
A Particle-in-Cell Simulation of a Cyclic Beam Buncher, A. L. Peratt, C. M. Snell, and F. S. Felber, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 18, p.626, (1990) (448KB).
REDSHIFTS
Comments on Tired-Light Mechanisms, H. Arp, IEEE TPS v.18, 1990 (136K).
Evidence for Quantized and Variable Redshifts in the Cosmic Background Rest Frame , W. G. Tifft, in Modern Mathematical Models of Time and Their Applications to Physics and Cosmology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1997 (1.2M).
Redshifts and Blueshifts of Spectral Lines Emitted by Two Correlated Sources, E. Wolf, Phys. Rev. Letters, 58, 2646, 1987 (176K)
Shifts of Spectral Lines Caused by Scattering from Fluctuating Random Media, D. F. V. James, M. P. Savedoff, and E. Wolf, Astrophysical J., 359, 67, 1990 (448K).
SOLAR, SOLAR SYSTEM, INTERSTELLAR, GALACTIC PLASMA, PLASMA SPACE, ELECTRIC SPACE
Filamentation of Volcanic Plumes on the Jovian Satellite Io, A. L. Peratt and A. J. Dessler, Astrophys. Space Sci. 144, pp. 451-461, 1988 (1M).
Interstellar Neutral Hydrogen Filaments at High Galactic Latitudes and the Bennett Pinch, G. L. Verschuur, Astrophys. Space Sci. 227, pp. 187-198, 1995 (776K).
Radiation Properties of Pulsar Magnetospheres: Observation, Theory, and Experiment. K. Healy and A. Peratt, Astrophys. Space Sci. 227, 1995 (1.1MB).
Galactic Neutral Hydrogen Emission Profile Structure, G. L. Verschuur and A. L. Peratt, Astron. J. 118, pp.1252-1267, 1999 (672K).
Observation of the CIV Effect in Interstellar Clouds: A Speculation on the Physical Mechanism for Their Existence, A. L. Peratt and G. L. Verschuur, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. December 2000 (344K).
Trends in Apparent Time Intervals Between Multiple Supernovae Occurrences, E. Sanders, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.31, pp.1252-1262, 2003 (408Kb)
Self-similarity of plasma networking in a broad range of length scales: From laboratory to cosmic plasmas, A. B. Kukushkin and V. A. Rantsev-Kartinov, Rev. Scientific Instr., 70, n.2, pp.1387-1391, 1999.
SPACE PLASMA PIONEERS
Plasma Physics from Laboratory to Cosmos—The Life and Achievements of Hannes Alfvén, C.-G. Fälthammar (808KB)
Dean of the Plasma Dissidents, A. L. Peratt, The World & I, Natural Science Sec., pp.190-197, May 1988, (4 MB)
The Most Feared Astronomer on Earth: Halton Arp. W. Kaufman III. (592KB).
A Tribute to Oscar Buneman—Pioneer of Plasma Simulation, R. Buneman, R. J. Barker, A. L. Peratt, S. H. Brecht, A. B. Langdon, H. R. Lewis, IEEE Trans.Plasma Sci. 22, 1994 (1.2MB)
The Legacy of Birkeland's Plasma Torch, A. L. Peratt, The Kristian Birkeland Lecture, Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, v.9, Oslo, Norway, 1996 (12MB).
In Memoriam Grote Reber 1911-2002 Founder of Radio Astronomy, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 31, December 2003 (372kB)
ENERGETIC AURORAS: NEAR-EARTH MANIFESTATIONS OF THE PLASMA UNIVERSE

PLASMA SCIENCE APPLICATION PRESENTATIONS

Labels:

Popular Posts